• Find It

• Make Your Mark

  
  
  
  
  

• From BlogRush

• Recent Posts

  • is that a chainsaw?
  • bataan death march
  • Grey areas
  • name your running mate, already
  • Super Tuesday

• Recent Comments

  • Todd on name your running mate, already
  • Endorsement Who? on name your running mate, already
  • Chris Myers Asch on Public Service Academy
  • Informed Voter on 2nd Republican Debate, Pt. 1
  • GirafeLady on 2nd Republican Debate, Pt. 1

Yesterday, Jon Stewart referred to the ongoing Democratic primaries as “the long, flat bataan death march to the Whitehouse.” Amen, brother. Check out these two emails:

First, from Hillary’s campaign:

Dear Abi,

Tonight’s victory in Indiana was close, and a margin that narrow means just one thing: every single thing you did to help us win in Indiana helped make the difference.

Every call you made, every friend you spoke to about our campaign, every dollar you contributed made tonight’s victory possible. And I couldn’t be more thankful for your hard work.

Every time we’ve celebrated a victory, we’ve celebrated it together. And tonight is no exception. This victory is your victory, this campaign is your campaign, and your support has been the difference between winning and losing.

Thank you so much for making this campaign possible. Let’s keep making history together.

Sincerely,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Next, from Barack:

 

Abigail –

We just won a decisive victory in North Carolina thanks to people like you.

Indiana remains too close to call. But what is clear is that we did much better than all the pundits predicted, despite Republicans changing parties to support Senator Clinton, believing she would be easier for Senator McCain to defeat.

Here’s where we stand.

As of Tuesday morning, we needed just 273 delegates to clinch the nomination. When the votes are fully counted Wednesday morning, we will have gained more than a third of them in a single day.

We have a clear path to victory. But now is the time for each one of us to step up and do what we can to close out this primary.

Please make a donation of $25 right now:

https://donate.barackobama.com/results

Thank you for everything you’re doing,

Barack

 

Can they really not see the damage this is doing to the party? I was gratified to hear Barack say on Meet the Press that no matter what, he wants to see a Democrat win in November. I haven’t heard such a comment from Hillary. In fact, she’s already lumping Barack in with the losers and aligning herself with McCain as the best candidates, which is troubling. But what can we do?  One more month, and the death march is over. Let’s hope someone is still standing!

(I am in no way belitting the harrowing experience of the actual Bataan Death March. Please don’t take it that way.)

Anyone else anxious for the announcements of running mates? If Hillary is losing momentum, as the media says almost by the minute, it seems like that could help her. Over at Compassion in Politics, they think Edwards will endorse Obama by the end of the month. I kind of think he’s waiting until someone asks him to be a running mate.

Speaking of endorsements, the New York Times has a cool endorsements page here. Not their own endorsements, but who is endorsing who.

McCain has got it all sewn up, so now the Dems just have to fight out the rest of the primaries. There’s been some speculation about superdelegates swooping in at the National Convention and offering up a new name.

Honestly, after I sent in my absentee ballot on Feb. 1st, I kind of lost interest because what can I do until the general election? Is this the apathy that I normally detest? Or reasonable rest before the next big race that I can be involved in?

In other news, my Congressman Darrell Issa was on Bill Maher the other night, and true to form, he sounded like a party-line fool. I wish we could get him some serious opposition in my district!

So, it’s coming down to the wire around here. My primary is coming up next month, and I’m still on the fence. I’m having trouble finding the nuances of difference between Clinton, Obama and Edwards, and I have to say, the debates are really helping.

I posted a quiz site a while back, and I just took the quiz again. My results were the same. If my theoretical candidate gets 100%, Barack is #2 at 78%. With Kucinich coming in 3rd, Hillary coming in 7th and Edwards coming in 9th. So there you go.

But then I’ve been watching the AMC series Mad Men and I can’t help but be grateful to Hillary and women like her for women’s lib and I think I’d love to see a woman president. Can I vote for her because of that? Do I really prefer what Obama stands for more? I’m not sure…I liked his book a lot. Especially what he had to say about ending the generational poverty in poor areas. But I also agree with Edwards “no special interest” rantings.

What I’d really like to do is squish them into one person.

As for the republicans, I just like to squish them.

Anyway, take the quiz. It’s fun. And informative. After you’re done, you can post your candidate preferences on a forum. I clicked around a few and a everyone I looked at was the polar opposite of mine. It just goes to show you that what Bill Maher says is true, we are like two separate countries voting for two separate presidents. (If you don’t have HBO, like me, you can download Real Time with Bill Maher on iTunes for free!)

I wonder if anyone will really be able to bridge that gap - or cross the aisle.

Not sure when your Primary will be? The NY Times has a very clear schedule - not only of when Dems and Reps will vote, but what the candidates will need to ensure victory. Check it out - and stay informed!

Democratic Primaries

Republican Primaries

Another poll results site: Leading Presidential Polls 2008. This one is much more user friendly than pollingreport.com, and has lots of interactive polls for readers as well. You can also select specific state polls, and specific candidate polls. Check it out!

Too much time has passed since my last post. I plan to remedy that - especially now that things are heating up - if only just a little. So, two topics…Fred Thompson and Barack Obama.

First let me say that Fred Thompson’s late announcement was so unsurprising that I’d hardly call it an announcement. I’m intrigued by his high ratings within the GOP, and I’d love to see a basically non-fundraising candidate do well, but I just think he’s too far behind the big money candidates in his party. It will be interesting to see if his lackadaisical approach is effective.

I’m on disk three of Barack’s The Audacity of Hope. My first thought is that I’m not bored. I’ve even laughed out loud a couple times - which is something I did not do with any of John McCain’s books or Hillary Clinton’s book. I’m not quite ready to jump on the Barack bandwagon, but I like what he had to say in 2005, when this book was written. I also liked what he had to say on The Daily Show. I think if he paired up with one of the senior statesmen like Chris Dodd or Joe Biden, we’d have a pretty good ticket on the Dem side.

Anyone reading anything good?

Pro Choice or Pro Life? Gay Marriage? New taxes? Welfare reform?

I recently had a very long conversation with my friend regarding abortion. She has long voted for Republicans simply because she’s pro life, and in line with the leaders of her church, she votes for extreme conservatives. She also took advantage of programs available to her when she had her children such as no cost health care for her delivery (provided by the government) as well as WIC and food stamps. Her husband owned a small business and they had a few very lean years. The fact that the people she was voting for were basically against those programs intended for low income families never really dawned on her or mattered to her.

So here’s my real question? Do the real, daily-life issues matter to voters? Or only the big, sensational issues?

For example, the cost of health care really effects my family. We have high deductibles for our PPO, and end up spending a lot out of pocket. We pay into Social Security every month weeks, and yet, there’s about 100% possibility that we’ll never see that money again. Same with Medicare. We have a young son, and we’d like for there to be quality public education for him and some natural resources available for his grandchildren. Likewise, we pay a lot in taxes and we’d like to see that used more wisely - if not, then give it back. We could use it to save for our retirement, since we won’t have Social Security.

What I’m saying is that I’m glad to know where the candidates stand on issues like abortion. It helps me to understand what kinds of Supreme Court Justices they would appoint, the kind of legislation they might pass/veto. However, I wish less time was spent during the debates on these polarizing topics. I want to know what these people are going to do about issues that effect our everyday lives.

One last topic…Bring the troops home or stay the course? Some candidates (Obama, Dodd) say that they’re going to bring the troops home immediately, while some are sticking to the “stay the course” doctrine (McCain)…do you think this will be a deciding factor in the election? Personally, I want the troops home yesterday - three years ago, even. But what I’d rather hear them talk about is how they’re going to repair the US’s reputation and standing in the world. How we exit Iraq will be a part of that, but I’d like to hear more specific plans for diplomacy.

The New York Times online has an excellent page with all of the candidates listed - including the officially announced candidates and the widely speculated ones. Each candidate has an info page, a link to their official site, and many have their most recent multimedia (YouTube video, etc.).

Here’s the link:

2008 Presidential Candidates

Before you get started here, I highly recommend this backgrounder by Lionel Beehner, Staff Writer for the Council on Foreign Relations.

It’s all very confusing. Why are we trying to dictate what Iraq does with their national resources? I can’t wrap my head around why our government thinks they have any say in what Iraq does with their oil. Passing a bill in congress that dictates what Iraq must do might sound good to Americans - then if it fails, it’s the Iraqi’s fault - but this seems to be terrible logic to me. Here’s a good article outlining the issues with the first “benchmark” - the oil law.

Hasan Jum’a Awwad, Head of the Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions, recently sent an open letter to the US Congress pleading that the acceptance of an oil law not be linked to the withdrawal of US troops.

From the Council on Foreign Relations website, here’s a sort of breakdown of the current benchmarks, (prepared by Lionel Beehner) :

In President Bush’s January 2007 speech outlining his latest strategy for Iraq, he listed a series of benchmarks on security, economic performance, and governance for the Iraqi government to meet. They include passing an oil revenue-sharing bill, reversing the draconian de-Baathification laws his administration previously forced on Iraq, and holding new provincial elections. He also demanded progress in the spending of billions of dollars in reconstruction money and revisions to the constitutional amendment process. “America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has announced,” Bush proclaimed.

How can we hold another government to benchmarks we make up? Without clear guidelines of what defines both success and failure, how can we say we’re winning or losing?
I really feel like it’s not a win/loss situation. It’s a disaster that shouldn’t go on needlessly. Let Iraq govern themselves. The US has no business dictating how their constitution is worded, how much of their oil goes to foreign investors or how their government is divided up between the peoples of Iraq. If anything, the US should pull out all contractors, let the Iraqi’s offer contracts for rebuilding worldwide. The current contractors can pool the billions in profits they’re making to finance actual reconstruction WITH oversight.

Are we obligated to offer some sort of security force? I don’t know. I believe that the US presence fuels the insurgency, and that all progress will continue to be undone by bombs and shooting while we remain there.

So finally, here’s my assessment. The Democrats tried to put together a bill that included the President’s benchmarks and a time line for troop withdrawal. The time line was denied, but the benchmarks remain. It seems very convenient for our Congress and and Executive Branch to approve of something that the US has no way to enforce and no control over.
I hope others will comment on this entry. I’m always looking for new viewpoints, and the more we all understand the situation, the better we can PARTICIPATE in our government.

Paid for, presented by and moderated by Fox News. That alone was troubling to me. But as they went through the many Republican candidates, I was struck by amount of public service - both in state and federal government. Impressive amount of government experience.

I’m typing these notes as I watch the debates on msnbc.com, so bear with me if it’s a little incoherent or long winded. You can skip around to the different headings if you’re not interested in the topics. Also, these are just my opinions as I watch this 2nd debate. I encourage everyone to watch the debates, and form their own opinions!
Read more

Next Page →

• Blogroll

  • 10Questions.com
  • Center for Responsive Politics
  • Christian Science Monitor - USA
  • CNN/Politics
  • Conceive Magazine
  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • Generation Engage
  • Good Magazine
  • Indecision2008
  • MSNBC Politics
  • National Public Radio
  • Project Vote Smart
  • Salon.com
  • Slate
  • Snippets and Blabbery
  • SoCalChildcare.com
  • The Atlantic
  • The White House
  • USAElectionPolls.com
  • YouChoose ‘08

• Great Blogs

  Snippets and Blabbery
  InvestorBlogger.com
  Breakdown in the Fastlane
  Caffeinated Ramblings
  Uncommon Notions
  

• Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

• Take me back...

  • October 2008 (1)
  • May 2008 (1)
  • April 2008 (1)
  • February 2008 (2)
  • January 2008 (5)
  • November 2007 (1)
  • October 2007 (10)
  • September 2007 (1)
  • June 2007 (1)
  • May 2007 (13)
  • April 2007 (2)
  • March 2007 (2)
  • February 2007 (1)

• Directories

  

  

  

  

  

  Pajama Mommy Directory